Why does it look as if judge Thomas Clarence is implicated in the baby murdering business? Firstly, by calling it “trash’, he might be referring to the fetus. Secondly, he has a guilty face.
The trash bag is clearly marked Roe V Wade and we all know it is referring to that Supreme Court precedent ruling. I think that ruling was flawed and I’m pretty sure Justice Thomas agrees with me!
Pat Cross Cartoons 
Why does it look as if judge Thomas Clarence is implicated in the baby murdering business? Firstly, by calling it “trash’, he might be referring to the fetus. Secondly, he has a guilty face.
LikeLike
I’m sorry that it looks that way. Thomas is referring to the decision Roe V Wade not babies killed by it. His face is supposed to express disgust.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The trash bag is clearly marked Roe V Wade and we all know it is referring to that Supreme Court precedent ruling. I think that ruling was flawed and I’m pretty sure Justice Thomas agrees with me!
LikeLike